BATTLEFIELD BAD COMPANY 2 VS. CALL OF DUTY BLACK OPS
Spoiler Alert Damn It!
Guys just saying, this is my very first time making a review so don't be to harsh on me and I will take any suggestions into account!
I will the compare them according to their Graphics, Gameplay, and Multiplayer. Let's start:
First of all, graphics are very important in a game so more people would be attracted to it.
Here are some previews:
Battlefield bad company 2:
Call of Duty Black OPS:
Well this is my opinion: Both of the game's graphics are very impresive but battlefield has better special effects when it comes to explosives and they also have the best sound effects in a first person shooter games .
*Battlefield wins this round
Gameplay(Singleplayer) : Lets talk about the story of each game
Battlefield Bad company 2: Here's a basic summary, there are 4 soldiers fighting somewhere in Alaska(I think) and they have to capture some Russian guy. They were unable to catch him so they had to travel to different places to find him and they also discover the plans of the Russian guy. He wants to find a "super weapon" thing that was made during World war 2. As usual, the Russian discovers it, used it on a city and now is threatening America. In the end, 4 soldiers single handedly killed a fraction of the Russian army. They also able to stop(kill) the Russian guy we were talking about and stopped his plans from destroying America.
Now, let's actually talk about the gameplay:
Depending on the difficulty of the game: it takes around 7-8 hours to complete all 13 missions.
General controls of Bad company 2(fire, move) isn't really different with Call of duty(except for knifing and grenade and crouch).
Call of Duty Black Ops: Ok, since I am to lazy to summarize the story just look it up on Google =)
Comparison: In this round, Black Ops wins because the story is really mind bottling. When I first played Black Ops, I thought the story was crap because I thought it was just another story about killing a guy or the leader. But as I continued to play , I realized that everything in the story had a reason. For example, the main character was mind controlled to kill the president of America but when he finally had a chance to kill him, he didn't because another guy mind controlled him to kill the leader of the bad guys.
But, if it comes to more explosion and destruction , Bad company wins
Finally MULTIPLAYER:
Just by watching online multiplayer gameplays of both games, it is already obvious that Battlefield wins this round. In battlefield, there are 4 classes to choose from: Assault, Engineer, Medic and Scout. As as assault, you should be in the front lines making way for vehicles and other players to finish the mission. As an engineer, so should make sure that you repair vehicles of your team and destroy to vehicles of your enemies.As a medic, you should stay close to players on the front lines so whenever they get killed, you SHOULD revive them so you won't lose reinforcement tickets. As a scout, simply kill enemies from a far using your sniper rifle. You can even destroy almost anything(like buildings, walls) in this game and it is also almost impossible to camp here(this is why fags who are used to camping in call of duty hate the multiplayer of battlefield).You can also actually ride awsome vehicles like tanks, humvees and even helicopters. The key to winning a game here IS TO WORK AS A DAMN TEAM!!
On the other hand, in call of duty multiplayer, the only thing you should do is go around around the map, camp and kill people..........
Obviously Battle Bad company 2 wins this mutha round [] )
In total: COD gets 1 point
Battle Field gets 2 points (winner)
Thank you guys very much for reading my review and hopefully you could come back every week( I would post reviews every week)
Next..........: Minecraft vs. Sims 3 =) (Remember graphics aren't the most important element of a game)
No comments:
Post a Comment